Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Maddox v. Foley et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Clarice M Maddox
Defendant:
Mike Foley, Mary Kathrine Huffman, Timothy O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Allen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Bonnie M. Allen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04400
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn M. Allen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Wash, et al
as 4:2021cv00845
Defendant:
Staffmark Investments, LLC, Danyel Turner and Janet Wash
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 4:2020cv01746
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Allen
Intervenor Defendant:
Ohio State Penitentiary
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen-Buckles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00602
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jana M. Allen-Buckles and Jana Marie Allen-Buckles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Allen v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
Betty M. Allen
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02471
Plaintiff:
Joyce M. Allen
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Childress v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2013cv00907
Plaintiff:
Amy Childress
Defendant:
Hamilton County , Robert Walker , John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
