Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(PC)Williams v. Peterson et al
as 2:2021cv02335
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Defendant:
A. Peterson, M. Camarena, R. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curiel v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv01545
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jose M Curiel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
(PC) Ellis v. Diaz et al
as 3:2020cv01679
Defendant:
John S. Somers, M. Curiel, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ellis v. Diaz et al
as 1:2020cv00295
Defendant:
John S. Somers, M. Curiel, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce Haney v. P. Sullivan, et al
as 20-15159
Defendant / Appellee:
P. SULLIVAN, Captain, KIM KUMAR, Chief Medical, E. DOEHING, Nurse Practitioner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE PATRICK HANEY
Johnny Sloan, Jr. v. Debbie Asuncion, et al
as 19-15728
Defendant / Appellee:
D. TYLER, L. M. PENNISI, Jr., T. SHELBY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY L. SLOAN, Jr.
Bruce Haney v. P. Sullivan, et al
as 19-15458
Defendant / Appellee:
P. SULLIVAN, Captain, KIM KUMAR, Chief Medical, E. DOEHING, Nurse Practitioner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE PATRICK HANEY
Turner v. Salinas Valley State Prison et al
as 3:2018cv02289
Plaintiff:
Demareak J. Turner
Defendant:
Salinas Valley State Prison, P. Sullivan, M. Curiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Haney v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2017cv03808
Plaintiff:
Bruce P. Haney
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, K. Kumar, E. Doehing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
