Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Collins v. Hess et al
as 7:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Kenard M. Collins
Defendant:
C/O H. C. Hess, C/O C. Lauderback, C/O C. Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Massengill et al
as 7:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Antonari William Alexander and Anton William Alexander
Defendant:
Sgt. Massengill, U. M. Collins, Lt. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Equal Pay Act
Alexander v. Mullins et al
as 7:2020cv00752
Defendant:
A. Mullins, Harold Clarke, Sgt. S. Dutton and others
Plaintiff:
Antonari William Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. United States Department Of Defense
as 1:2019cv00628
Defendant:
United States Department Of Defense
Plaintiff:
Manley M Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Meyers v. Sargent et al
as 7:2019cv00002
Defendant:
U/M-Collins, Assistant Attorney General Charisse Mullen, W. Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Jones et al
as 7:2018cv00598
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, P. Deel, Carl Manis and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trustees Of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. William M. Collins Co., Inc.
as 1:2018cv00386
Plaintiff:
Trustees Of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Defendant:
William M. Collins Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Maddox v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00179
Plaintiff:
Melvin Corey Maddox
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Fred Shilling, Tracy S. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Billy M. Collins
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
