Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Drake v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 2:2013cv01022
Plaintiff:
Jamiasen Drake
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jerry Brown, Jefferey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallika Attygala et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 2:2012cv10075
Plaintiff:
Kevin Aleem, Eulice Gene Anderson, Kevin Anderson and others
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, Other Wells Does and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Howard v. Cool et al
as 3:2011cv00291
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, D. Cool and Sgt. M. Dooley
Plaintiff:
Samuel Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DDOLEY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv74236
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. DOOLEY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOOLEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39950
Plaintiff:
JAMES M DOOLEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Filing Error
as 1:2010cv00543
Plaintiff:
Diane M. Dooley
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Dooley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv00544
Plaintiff:
Diane M. Dooley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
DOOLEY v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31906
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. DOOLEY
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dooley v. CRS Medical Benefits, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00987
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Dooley
Defendant:
CRS Medical Benefits, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dixon v. HDSP Maintenance Department et al
as 2:2009cv01709
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
HDSP Maintenance Department, M. Dooley, Cole Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
