Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Watson v. Allison et al
as 5:2022cv04522
Plaintiff:
Rhone Watson
Defendant:
CDCR, CCHCS, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Barker v. M. Farooq et al
as 5:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Anthony Barker
Defendant:
M. Farooq, R. Amis, K. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Sabino Quair II v. Calif. Corr. Health Care Services et al
as 5:2019cv01651
Defendant:
S. Lesher, T. Le, E. Tootell and others
Plaintiff:
David Sabino Quair III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert Wolff v. State of California, et al
as 17-55508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT D. WOLFF
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHINO STATE PRISON and others
Thurman Gaines v. Michael Vy et al
as 5:2017cv00648
Respondent:
M Farooq, Naveed Riaz, M.D., Robert Rudas and others
Plaintiff:
Thurman Gaines
Thurman Gaines v. Vy et al
as 1:2017cv00435
Plaintiff:
Thurman Gaines
Defendant:
Michael Vy, Naveed Riaz, M.D., M. Farooq and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Rust v. Chino Prison Healthcare Providers et al
as 5:2017cv00556
Defendant:
Chino Prison Healthcare Providers, L. Escobell, M. Farooq and others
Plaintiff:
Frank A Rust
Frank Rust v. Chino Prison Healthcare Providers et al
as 2:2017cv02225
Defendant:
Chino Prison Healthcare Providers, L. Escobell, M. Farooq and others
Plaintiff:
Frank A Rust
Kevin Dean Brewer v. Don Oh et al
as 5:2015cv00877
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dean Brewer
Defendant:
L Escobel, L Escobel, M Farooq and others
Herbert Wolff v. State of California et al
as 5:2015cv00244
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections - Chino and Mule Creek State Prisons, California Department of Corrections - Chino and Mule Creek State Prisons, California Department of Corrections, Sacrament, CA and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Wolff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
