Cases 1 - 10 of 17
French v. Mahone et al
as 1:2021cv01222
Plaintiff:
Eric French
Defendant:
Sylvie Mahone, Dr Andre Tilden, . McNabb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP
as 1:2020cv02120
Defendant:
Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP
Plaintiff:
Romesa M. Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Danville C.C. Records Office et al
as 1:2017cv09131
Plaintiff:
Levoia M Hardy
Defendant:
Danville C.C. Records Office, Catlett, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Illinois Dept. of Corr. et al
as 1:2013cv05977
Plaintiff:
Marcus Washington
Defendant:
Illinois Dept. of Corr., Wexford Health Soures, M. Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Hardy et al
as 1:2013cv03497
Plaintiff:
Darnell Cooper
Defendant:
M. Hardy, C. Edwards, R. Tarr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin et al v. Hardy et al
as 1:2012cv02970
Plaintiff:
Jose Franklin
Defendant:
M. Hardy, Pierce Guy, Sylvia Mahone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gevas v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01297
Plaintiff:
David Gevas
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., T. Utke, Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. I.D.O.C. Employees et al
as 1:2011cv07267
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Burns
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. Employees, Mahone, M. Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Hardy et al
as 2:2011cv02205
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Defendant:
Daniel B Hardy and Christy M Hardy
Cause Of Action: Mortgage Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
