Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Romelle Hawkins v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20456
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROMELLE M. HAWKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Hawkins v. The Estate of Jack Franzino et al
as 2:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Howard M Hawkins
Defendant:
The Estate of Jack Franzino and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Intervenor:
Ace American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hawkins v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00198
Petitioner:
Romelle M Hawkins
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv00632
Plaintiff:
Torey M Hawkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brady et al v. RSM McGladrey, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv00198
Plaintiff:
John D. Brady , Lance M. Hawkins , C. Davis Rankin, Jr. and others
Defendant:
RSM McGladrey, Inc. and McGladrey & Pullen, L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brady et al v. RSM McGladrey, Inc. et al - DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 1:2010cv00135
Plaintiff:
John D. Brady , Lance M. Hawkins , Jane T. Smith and others
Defendant:
RSM McGladrey, Inc. and McGladrey & Pullen, L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03503
Plaintiff:
Valerie Hawkins, Valerie Hawkins, Gail B. Barnes and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Shaw Environmental Inc and Federal Emergency Management Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
