Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02291
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02282
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Jeremiah Hoskins, DeMarcus Bush and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmons v. Moore et al
as 2:2013cv02784
Plaintiff:
Michael Timmons
Defendant:
Robert Moore, M. Jackson, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02516
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Williams v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2007cv02189
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lanee Williams
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, E. Hoffman, R. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
