Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Scott v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv02083
Plaintiff:
Charlie Scott
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Well Path and Grady Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv01911
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, A. Morell, Andrea Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Sherry Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pumphrey v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv01800
Petitioner:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pumphrey v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv01801
Petitioner:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fair v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Demonty L. Fair
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox v. Foley et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Clarice M Maddox
Defendant:
Mike Foley, Mary Kathrine Huffman, Timothy O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
D'Mante Dontrell Anderson
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, APD Officer A. Morell, APD Officer Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00419
Petitioner:
Deonta David
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
De'Onte Miller v. Melody Maddox, et al
as 22-14019
Petitioner / Appellant:
DE'ONTE MILLER
Respondent / Appellee:
MELODY M. MADDOX and LORANDY AKIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
