Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Bey v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 1:2015cv04918
Plaintiff:
Baxter Aziz Bey
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Edward Gannon, Julie Colin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MacNeill et al v. OptumInsight, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04730
Plaintiff:
John MacNeill and Keila M. Rivera
Defendant:
OptumInsight, Inc. and United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Robinson v. Rivera et al
as 1:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner Peter M. Rivera, New York State Department of Labor, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pascazi v. Rivera
as 7:2013cv09029
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Pascazi
Defendant:
Peter M. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. The Renaissance Project, Inc.
as 1:2013cv06406
Plaintiff:
Luis M. Rivera
Defendant:
The Renaissance Project, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rivera v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00610
Plaintiff:
Anna M Rivera
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
JTE Enterprises, Inc. v. Cuomo et al
as 2:2013cv01425
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Thomas Dinapoli, Leonard D. Polletta and others
Plaintiff:
JTE Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Purisima v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2013cv01068
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, CRST, Inc., Midlands Claim Administrators, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Kindell v. N.Y.S. Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2012cv04579
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kindell
Defendant:
Correctional Officer #8208, The City of New York, E. Ruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
