Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Eliason v. Department of Justice, The et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Brett L. Eliason
Defendant:
Department of Justice, The, Cecilia M Romero and Sean Reyes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Caballero v. Romero
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Carlos Caballero
Defendant:
Kenneth M. Romero, Carlos Villanueva, David Bruce Nava and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romero v. Nelson, et al
as 19-4175
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and SHANE NELSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUDY M. ROMERO
Romero v. State of Utah et al
as 4:2018cv00003
Petitioner:
Rudy M. Romero
Respondent:
State of Utah, Shane Nelson and Utah Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero et al v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2016cv01224
Plaintiff:
Marcus M. Romero and Velma J. Romero
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armijo et al v. Board of County Commissioners of San Miguel County
as 1:2013cv00839
Plaintiff:
Jose B Ortiz, Victoria Gallegos, Alfred Apodaca and others
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of San Miguel County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Romero v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv01823
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Laura M. Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv00711
Plaintiff:
Tasha M Romero
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Romero v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation
as 1:2011cv01362
Plaintiff:
Florence M. Romero
Defendant:
Dayton-Hudson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
