Cases 61 - 70 of 176
Smith v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Smith
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Matthew Swalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Danville Illinois et al
as 2:2017cv02323
Plaintiff:
Jared M Smith
Defendant:
City of Danville Illinois, Calvin Showers, Jr, Bruce Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt et al v. GAbbot state of Texa Employees et al
as 1:2017cv08967
Plaintiff:
George G. Wyatt, Lisa M. Hill Wyatt, Nell Johnson and others
Defendant:
GAbbot state of Texa Employees, T-D-C-J-I-Wardens, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jared Smith v. Lieutenant Walsh, et al
as 17-3369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARED M. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WALSH, Lincoln Correctional Center, OFFICER PFEIFFER, Lincoln Correctional Center and KESS ROBERSON, Lincoln Correctional Center
Jared Smith v. Kess Roberson, et al
as 17-3370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARED M. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KESS ROBERSON and L. HOPP, HCUA Head of Healthcare Unit
Blakes v. Smith
as 3:2017cv03227
Plaintiff:
Michael Blakes
Defendant:
Keenan M Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith v. Little Bear Daycare Center
as 1:2017cv06044
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Smith
Defendant:
Little Bear Daycare Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Darnell Smith v. Sangamon County Sheriff's Dept, et al
as 17-2608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL M. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SANGAMON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, NEIL WILLIAMSON, Sheriff and ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE RECORDS SECTION WORKING ON 12/23/2008
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
