Cases 1 - 10 of 21
WALKER v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
BRODRICK M WALKER
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and ANTONIE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Wormuth et al
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kathryn M. Walker
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth and The Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PATEL et al v. AKBRUDIN
as 7:2019cv00188
Defendant:
DAVIS HARRIS, CHARLES M WALKER, VISHNU SUTARIA and others
Not Classified By Court:
NARENDRA MODI and EVA M LAMEH
Plaintiff:
KRISHNA PATEL and VIJAY PATEL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Walker
as 5:2019cv00097
Defendant:
DALE M WALKER
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Walker v. Beaver
as 1:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
Tyson M. Walker
Defendant:
Bradley A. Beaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. Bell Sports, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01483
Plaintiff:
Kirsten M. Walker and Rodney L. Walker
Defendant:
Bell Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutledge v. Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv04405
Plaintiff:
Gregory Rutledge, Jr.
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department, R. L. (Butch) Conway, Mike Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. McKay et al
as 1:2016cv04063
Plaintiff:
Howard Anderson Lee
Defendant:
Douglas McKay, R. L. Butch Conway, Investigation Division (Supervisors) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv02840
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Allison M. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. Brantley
as 1:2016cv01910
Plaintiff:
Gloria M. Walker and Marvin Walker
Defendant:
Grant Brantley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
