Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Wilson v. Heath
as 13-1610
Petitioner - Appellant:
Robert M. Wilson
Respondent - Appellee:
Phillip Heath
SANCHEZ v. CONTRERAS et al
as 1:2012cv02972
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Sanchez
Defendant:
Manuel Contreras , National development and construction corp. , Bradley M. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
SANCHEZ v. CONTRERAS et al
as 7:2012cv02972
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Sanchez
Defendant:
Manuel Contreras , National development and construction corp. , Bradley M. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Jackson v. Pfau
as 12-324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nahshon Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
Ann T. Pfau, Chief Administrative Judge; State of New York, Nancy M. Mangold, Director; Division of Court Operations, Benjamin Steinberg, Court Administration and others
New Amsterdam Capital Partners, LLC v. Wilson et al
as 1:2011cv09716
Plaintiff:
New Amsterdam Capital Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Michael M. Wilson and J.D. & Assoc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Heath
as 9:2011cv00827
Petitioner:
Robert M. Wilson
Respondent:
Phillip Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. New York State Department of Corrections
as 1:2011cv01212
Petitioner:
Justin M. Wilson
Respondent:
New York State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. State of Chicago et al
as 2:2011cv00737
Defendant:
Atlanta, California, Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Tara M. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. New York State Department of Corrections
as 1:2011cv00562
Respondent:
New York State Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Justin M. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Pfau et al
as 9:2010cv01484
Plaintiff:
Nahshon Jackson
Defendant:
Ann T. Pfau, Nancy M. Mangold, Benjamin Steinberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
