Cases 1 - 10 of 3,364
Ruff v. McCulloch et al
as 7:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D Ruff
Defendant:
Robin McCulloch, Lori Hodgkins, Atticus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin et al v. Team Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03681
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Griffin and Kariem Ibrahim
Defendant:
Team Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Leagem Partners LLC et al v. WebBank
as 1:2024cv03424
Plaintiff:
Leagem Partners LLC, 535 East 148 LLC, 554 MBN Partners LLC and others
Defendant:
WebBank, A Steel Partners Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 co Diversity-Conversion
Moss v. City of Hattiesburg
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Antonio Moss
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as 1:2024cv01821
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Smith
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Comer v. Holliman et al
as 2:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Comer
Defendant:
Rhonda Holliman, Regan Rodke, BN #518 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hart v. Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division
as 1:2024cv03123
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Marcus Hart
Defendant:
Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flores v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronnys Batista Flores
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Malcolm Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Garcia et al v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Miranda Garcia
Defendant:
LaDonna Phillips, Sherri Rodriguez, Janet Malcolm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
