Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Mack v. Easley
as 4:2024cv04016
Petitioner:
Malcolm C. Mack
Respondent:
Warden Jeffie Walker and Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mack v. Studdard et al
as 4:2024cv04002
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Cornelius Mack and Mal
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Studdard, Sheriff Wayne Easley, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Studdard et al
as 4:2023cv04119
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Cornelius Caldwell and Malcolm C. Mack
Defendant:
Officer Studdard, Officer Jackson, Lt. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phinney v. Greenwood Motor Lines Inc et al
as 4:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Phinney
Defendant:
Greenwood Motor Lines Inc doing business as R+L Carriers, R+L Carriers Inc, R&L Carriers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Allinder v. Dollar General Corporation
as 4:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Allinder
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Allinder v. Wahl Clipper Corporation
as 4:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Allinder
Defendant:
Wahl Clipper Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Figures v. Greene County Detention Center
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Figures
Defendant:
Greene County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01009
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC and John Does, 1-5
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plummer v. Kelley
as 5:2018cv00008
Respondent:
Wendy Kelley
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Plummer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
