Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Flores v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronnys Batista Flores
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Malcolm Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McMahan et al v. Olin Corporation et al (JRG1)
as 1:2024cv00096
Defendant:
Olin Corporation, Lonza Walkersville, Inc., Olin Chlor Alkali Products and others
Plaintiff:
LaMotta McMahan, Mauricio Acevedo, Marilyn B. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Campis v. Crank et al (TV2)
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tammy J. Campis
Defendant:
Malcolm T. Crank and Dana Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Huckins v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Huckins
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rival Transport, LLC v. Western Express Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00854
Plaintiff:
Rival Transport, LLC
Defendant:
Western Express Inc., MALCOLM JORRIN-PEREZ, David Nickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fletcher et al v. USA Global Logistics, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00513
Plaintiff:
Glen Fletcher, Jonathan Harper, Malcolm Moon and others
Defendant:
USA Global Logistics, LLC and Prezleigh Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Buress v. Bruns et al
as 2:2019cv02640
Defendant:
Doreen Shelton, Mario Carruth, John Doe(s)I-X and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Buress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. USA
as 2:2019cv00128
Petitioner:
Malcolm Sanchez Simmons
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
