Cases 41 - 50 of 90
CHIMENTI et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) et al
as 2:2015cv03333
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE CHIMENTI , DANIEL LEYVA and DAVID MALDONADO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) , JOHN WETZEL , PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALDONADO v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2014cv07371
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LAMAR MALDONADO
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maldonado v. Karnes et al
as 3:2014cv01330
Plaintiff:
William Maldonado
Defendant:
Robert J. Karnes, Timothy L. Clements and Tina Verna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALDONADO v. FOLINO
as 2:2014cv01716
Petitioner:
ANGEL MALDONADO
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. WIGEN
as 3:2014cv00033
Petitioner:
SANTOS MALDONADO
Respondent:
G. C. WIGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARNEY v. ABERTS et al
as 5:2013cv07236
Plaintiff:
JERMEY HEATH BARNEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM ABERTS and JOHN MALDONADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv07029
Petitioner:
DAVID MALDONADO
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. UNITED STATES
as 3:2013cv05545
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO MALDONADO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maldonado-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01308
Plaintiff:
Daniel Maldonado-Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. GIALA et al
as 2:2013cv01556
Plaintiff:
JOSE MALDONADO
Defendant:
LOUIS GIALA, MICHELLE FARRELL, HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
