Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00114
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Stone v. Malone et al
as 1:2016cv01150
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Stone
Defendant:
C. Malone, Johnson and C/O Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Showalter v. Clarke et al
as 1:2016cv00904
Plaintiff:
Mark Todd Showalter
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Dr. Malone, Dr. Cury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Finch et al
as 3:2015cv00626
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Hinton
Defendant:
FNU Finch, FNU Walker, C. Townes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malon v. Franklin Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00671
Plaintiff:
Andrew Malon
Defendant:
Franklin Financial Corporation , Richard T. Wheeler, Jr. , Hugh T. Harrison, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone v. Smallwood
as 7:2012cv00282
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Malone
Defendant:
Lee Smallwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. United States Of America
as 1:2012cv80444
Petitioner:
Lonnie Edward Malone
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stephenson Printing Inc. v. Brown et al
as 1:2011cv01269
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Printing Inc.
Defendant:
James Brown , Stuart Wolffe , William Malone and others
Counter_claimant:
David Uslan , Stuart Wolffe , James Brown and others
Counter_defendant:
Stephenson Printing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hayes v. Morrison et al
as 2:2009cv00431
Plaintiff:
Walter D. Hayes
Defendant:
W. Ware Morrison, Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, Edward E. Rollins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
