Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Galm v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv00962
Plaintiff: Paul Galm
Defendant: State of Oregon, John Malone, Shannon Moshofsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01343
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Black et al v. PacifiCorp et al
as 3:2022cv00566
Plaintiff: Susan Black, Dyarla Burns, Sean Leyland Campbell and others
Defendant: PacifiCorp and Pacific Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Aplin v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00258
Plaintiff: Colby Aplin
Defendant: B. Smith, Dewald, Fraser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv01085
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Chris E. Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Malone v. Commissioner Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00750
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Michael R. Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Danielle Franco-Malone
as 3:2016ad00010
In Re: Danielle Franco-Malone
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Type: Contract Insurance
Malone
as 3:2015ad00156
In Re: Kristin Michelle Malone
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01881
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Preferred Residential et al v. Dickenson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv00401
Defendant: Stephen Dickenson
Plaintiff: Larry Malone and Preferred Residential
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?