Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Arevalo v. Receivable Management Group, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02425
Plaintiff:
Manuel Arevalo
Defendant:
Receivable Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AREVALO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01727
Plaintiff:
MANUEL AREVALO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDREWS v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
KILLIAN ANDREWS, MANUEL AREVALO, GEORGE ASHFORD and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02143
Plaintiff:
Killian Andrews, Manuel Arevalo, George Ashford and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
USA v. Arevalo
as 1:2020cv01421
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Manuel Arevalo, Jr
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
USA v. Arevalo
as 2:2020at00970
Petitioner:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Arevalo, Jr
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
AREVALO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03767
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MANUEL AREVALO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Manuel Arevalo Mena
as 5:2013cv02263
Defendant:
Manuel Arevalo Mena
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Arevalo v. Agape Restaurant, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00336
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Arevalo
Defendant:
Agape Restaurant, LLC and Moises Granados
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Manuel Arevalo
as 12-50104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL MENA AREVALO, AKA Juan Manuel Mena Arevalo, AKA J. Manuel Arrevalo Mena, AKA Juan Mena, AKA Juan Manuel Arevalo Mena, AKA Juan Manuel Arrevalo Mena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
