Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Discrimination
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.072 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00372
Defendant:
Idolinda Flores Gutierrez, San Juana Alicia Flores, Arnoldo Javier Flores and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Flores v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2017cv00212
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Manuel Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv03142
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Manuel Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. LG Chem, Ltd. et al
as 1:2016cv00297
Defendant:
LG Chem, Ltd. and LG Chem America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2013cv00848
Plaintiff:
Manuel Flores , Maria Guadalupe Martinez , Janet Gonzales and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Morales v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00015
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, GEO Group, US Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Luis Manuel Flores Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodarte v. United States of America
as 5:2011cv00103
Petitioner:
Manuel Flores Rodarte
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Resendiz et al v. Rooftex, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01888
Plaintiff:
Miguel Reyes Resendiz , Fidel Ramirez Almendariz , Luis Manuel Flores Contreras and others
Defendant:
Rooftex, Inc., Cement Supply / Eagle Companies, LLC, Corrie Enyart and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Flores v. USA
as 4:2009cv00519
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Manuel Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
