Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mendoza Paloblanco v. USA
as 2:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Manuel Mendoza Paloblanco
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mendoza v. Fred Haas Motors, Ltd.
as 4:2019cv04119
Defendant:
Fred Haas Motors, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Mendoza et al v. Storm Tight Windows of Texas, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Storm Tight Windows of Texas, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Mendoza and Emma Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Mendoza-Calderon v. USA
as 5:2018cv00174
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Manuel Mendoza-Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sheppard v. Weatherford International, LLC, et al
as 4:2016cv01316
Plaintiff:
Mitch Sheppard , Vincent Perez , Melissa Lofton and others
Defendant:
Weatherford International LLC and Precision Energy Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Mendoza v. Garcia et al
as 3:2013cv00411
Defendant:
Stephen Gregory Garcia and Government Agent Name Unknown
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Garcia
as 3:2013cv00280
Defendant:
Stephen G. Garcia and Government Agent Name Unknown
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza et al v. Microsoft, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00378
Plaintiff:
Dezra Guthrie, Kaleb McKibben, Manuel Mendoza and others
Defendant:
Microsoft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 - Deceptive Trade Practices Act
Mendoza v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00086
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Mendoza
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mendoza v. United States Of America
as 3:2011cv00552
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Mendoza
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
