Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Torres-Ronda, et al v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., et al
as 20-1089
Defendant:
CARLOS CONTRERAS-APONTE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Public Works, JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, QBE SEGUROS, f/k/a Optima Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NOEMI TORRES-RONDA and ANGELO RIVERA-LAMBOY
Petitioner:
PR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS and OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF PUERTO RICO
Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AIG INSURANCE COMPANY - PUERTO RICO, f/k/a Chartis Insurance Company of Puerto Rico and ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO.
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Torres-Ronda, et al v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., et al
as 20-1038
Defendant:
CARLOS CONTRERAS-APONTE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Public Works, GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, FRANCISCO PARES ALICEA, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Treasury of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, QBE SEGUROS, f/k/a Optima Insurance Company, CARIBBEAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, f/k/a Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELO RIVERA-LAMBOY and NOEMI TORRES-RONDA
Petitioner:
PR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS and OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF PUERTO RICO
FDIC v. Constructora Japimel, Inc., et al
as 19-1845
3Rd Party Defendant:
ECHANDI GUZMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC., Echandi, Inc., ACE INSURANCE CO. and EFRAIN ECHANDI-OTERO
Defendant / Appellee:
CONSTRUCTORA JAPIMEL, INC.
Defendant:
MAPFRE, Praico Insurance Company of Puerto Rico
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Doral Bank
Rios-Rodriguez, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 19-1288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO C. OTERO-GONZALEZ, ERIKA MIRANDA-ACEVEDO, REBECA GONZALEZ-PEREZ and others
Defendant:
MARIA DEL CARMEN MURILLO-VELEZ, BUILDTECH CONTRACTOR CORP., DORAL MORTGAGE and others
Plaintiff:
GISELLE I. PASTRANA-CHICALNA, HECTOR PADILLA-MEDINA, MAYRA GONZALEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Doral Bank and ACE INSURANCE CO.
TSL Transport Solutions, Inc. v. Cruz et al
as 3:2017cv02158
Plaintiff:
TSL Transport Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose A. Cruz, Carlos Barada-Fernandez, Armando Julia-Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alstom Chile S.A. v. Mapfre Compania de Seguros
as 13-4521
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Alstom Chile S.A. and Alstom Power Systems S.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
Mapfre Compania de Seguros Generales Chile S.A.
Alstom Chile S.A. et al v. Mapfre Compania de Seguros Generales Chile S.A.
as 1:2013cv02416
Plaintiff:
Alstom Chile S.A. and Alstom Power Systems S.A.
Defendant:
Mapfre Compania de Seguros Generales Chile S.A.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 202 Agreement or award falling under the Convention
Torres-Ronda, et al v. Joint Underwriting Assocation, et al
as 12-8035
Plaintiff - Respondent:
NOEMI TORRES-RONDA and ANGELO RIVERA-LAMBOY
Defendant - Petitioner:
JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, CHARTIS INSURANCE COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO, COOPERATIVA DE SEGUROS MULTIPLES DE PUERTO RICO and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, RUBEN HERNANDEZ, Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Public Works, JESUS MENDEZ, Secretary of the Department of Treasury, in his official capacity and others
CI Spataro Napoli S.A. et al v. Intex Apparel Corporation
as 1:2012cv03388
Plaintiff:
CI Spataro Napoli S.A. and Mapfre Crediseguro, S.A.
Defendant:
Intex Apparel Corporation
Garnishee:
College Concepts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
CI Spataro Napoli S.A. et al v. Intex Apparel Corporation
as 1:2012mi00140
Plaintiff:
CI Spataro Napoli S.A. and Mapfre Crediseguro, S.A.
Defendant:
Intex Apparel Corporation
Garnishee:
College Concepts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
