Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
George v. Wood et al
as 1:2023cv00622
Petitioner:
Peyton George
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Wood, Deputy Gregory Phipps, Lieutenant Michael Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Adams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
Robert Tyrone Adams
Defendant:
Marcus Taylor and Shkeitha Swafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Taylor v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20702
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Taylor v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv03245
Petitioner:
Marcus Taylor
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marcus Taylor v. Greg Hamilton, et al
as 14-50314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG HAMILTON, JAMES N. SYLVESTER, Chief Deputy, OFFICER COLLINS, A.P.D. #7533 and others
Taylor et al v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2014cv00209
Defendant:
Phyllis Clair, Officer FNU Cleavand, Officer FNU Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Blanca Quiroz and Marcus Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. Flexxray, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00864
Plaintiff:
Marcus Taylor , Carl Taylor , Jose Garcia and others
Defendant:
Flexxray, LLC and Donald Forrest
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Jones v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2012cv00881
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jones
Defendant:
Caddo Parish, Demetria Parker, Patrick Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Taylor v. Kenneth Green, Jr., et al
as 09-40576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH GREEN, JR., JAMES W. KING, JOHNATHAN HYATT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
