Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wall v. Engelke et al
as 7:2021cv00052
Defendant:
Marie M. Vargo, A. Fuller and Mark E. Engelke
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roscoe v. Engelke et al
as 7:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Marie M. Vargo, Nartarcha Gregg, Malissa Welch and others
Plaintiff:
Emmitt G. Roscoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Engelke et al
as 7:2020cv00755
Plaintiff:
Asiatic Royalprince Allah and Asiatic RoyalPrince Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Marie M. Vargo, Mark E. Engelke and Liaison A. Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scottie Slate v. Marie Vargo
as 14-7105
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTTIE LEE SLATE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARIE M. VARGO
Jonathan Craig v. Marie Vargo
as 14-6818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CRAIG
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIE M. VARGO, Warden, MR. GILL, Staff Sargent, MR. FLEMMINGS, Correctional Officer and others
Sekou v. Vargo et al
as 1:2014cv00484
Plaintiff:
Kala Attiim Sekou
Defendant:
Marie M. Vargo, Mack A. Bailey, Timothy F. Puryear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Vargo et al
as 1:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Craig
Defendant:
Marie M. Vargo, Mr. Gill, Mr. Flemmings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2013cv00327
Petitioner:
Albert Lewis Perry, Jr
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slate v. Vargo
as 1:2012cv01477
Petitioner:
Scottie Lee Slate
Respondent:
Marie M. Vargo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bloom v. Jabe et al
as 7:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Daniel V.F. Bloom
Defendant:
Major C.D. Davis, Larry T. Edmonds, David B. Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
