Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mario Freeman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al
as 26-3301
Plaintiff:
MARIO FREEMAN
Defendant:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, DEVON YAZELL, Corrections Officer, CORRECTIONS OFFICER MARTIN and others
AV PD LLC v. Freeman et al
as 1:2025cv06429
Plaintiff:
AV PD LLC doing business as Sterling Villas
Defendant:
Mario Freeman and And All Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Freeman v. Carter
as 1:2025cv05854
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
Nysheba Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Freeman v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
as 1:2024cv00298
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Ms Tibbs, Ms Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois et al
as 1:2017cv01776
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
The University of Illinois at Chicago, The University of Illinois at Chicago Police Department, Daniel Lubin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. United States
as 1:2011cv02392
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. United States
as 1:2011cv01788
Defendant:
United States, Yum Brands, Inc., National Basketball Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
