Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brandon AdamsIn re: Brandon Adams
as 24-1370
Petitioner:
In re: BRANDON ADAMS
Respondent:
TRANSUNION CONSUMER SOLUTIONS and MARK A. KEARNEY
Robert DentIn re: Robert Dent
as 22-3434
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT WILSON DENT
Respondent:
TIMOTHY MORRIS, Police Officer, DARREN SMITH, YISLEIDY D. MINAYA-VARGAS, Reading Police Officer and others
Clervrain v. Chambers et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Brad Chambers, General Clif Todey, Joel Gorelick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2625
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2379
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Amro Elansari v. Mark Kearney
as 20-1476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMRO A. ELANSARI
Defendant:
MARK A. KEARNEY, (INDV. CAP.)
PICOZZI v. MCKEOWN et al
as 2:2018cv02532
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PICOZZI
Defendant:
WILLIAM MCKEOWN, BRENDIN GREER, GARY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALTHOUR v. KEARNEY
as 2:2017cv04951
Plaintiff:
VICTOR WALTHOUR
Defendant:
MARK A. KEARNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Advanced Reimbursement Mgmt
as 17-3187
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ADVANCED REIMBURSEMENT MANAGEMENT LLC, DBA Adreima
Defendant - Respondent:
CLAY PLAISANCE, TKC WORKS LLC, FKA HCR Healthcare Resources LLC and TKC PLAISANCE LLC, FKA Pinnacle Healthcare Group of Louisiana LLC
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MARK A. KEARNEY
In re: Dominique Jordan
as 17-2969
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DOMINIQUE JORDAN
Defendant - Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA MEDIA NETWORK
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MARK A. KEARNEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
