Cases 1 - 10 of 10
RISIS v. SOLAKIAN et al
as 2:2023cv04188
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M. RISIS
Defendant:
JIM SOLAKIAN, FRED DAIBUS, MICHAEL MCMANUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALSH v. CHIMI BURGERS LLC et al
as 2:2021cv17861
Petitioner:
MARTIN J. WALSH
Respondent:
CHIMI BURGERS LLC doing business as CHIMI BURGERS, CHIMI BURGERS 36 MARKET STREET doing business as CHIMI BURGERS and CARLOS REYES
GLC MARKET STREET LLC et al v. BRONX 656 FOOD CORP. et al
as 2:2020cv06749
Defendant:
323 MEAT & GROCERY, INC., F.T. MEAT CORP., BRONX 656 FOOD CORP. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
946 MARKET STREET, LLC
Plaintiff:
GENERAL TRADING CO., INC. and GLC MARKET STREET LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
950 MEAT & GROCERY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. v. MARKET STREET VAGABOND, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05476
Plaintiff:
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
MARKET STREET VAGABOND, INC. and SAAD ZAMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MARKET STREET SURGICAL CENTER LLC v. HARRY et al
as 2:2013cv05585
Plaintiff:
MARKET STREET SURGICAL CENTER LLC
Defendant:
MARLEY HARRY and UNITED HEALTHGROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON TO THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 4234 MARKET STREET(formerly known as 1672 Market Street), WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA 16365 (U et al
as 2:2010cv03662
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON TO THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 4234 MARKET STREET, ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON TO THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 5 NORTHRIDGE DRIVE, NORTH WINDHAM, CONNECTICUT 06256 and ALL RIGHT, TITL AND INTEREST, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON TO THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS VACANT COMMERCIAL LAND, U.S. ROUTE 219
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON TO THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 4234 MARKET STREET(formerly known as 1672 Market Street), WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA 16365 (U et al
as 1:2010cv03662
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON TO THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 4234 MARKET STREET, ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON TO THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 5 NORTHRIDGE DRIVE, NORTH WINDHAM, CONNECTICUT 06256 and ALL RIGHT, TITL AND INTEREST, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON TO THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS VACANT COMMERCIAL LAND, U.S. ROUTE 219
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $225,894.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO. 3209038078, HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT CAPITAL ONE et al
as 2:2008cv03533
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$225,894.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO. 3209038078, HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT CAPITAL ONE, UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO. 082428948, HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT TWO RIVER COMMUNITY BANK, 120 HIGHWAY 35 MIDDLETOWN, NEW JERSEY 07748 and UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO. 674585321, HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT HSBC BANK, 1105 NORTH MARKET STREET, SUITE 1, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
