Cases 1 - 10 of 48
BOYD v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON and Officer REINFROE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Hancock State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Hancock State Prison and Officer Reinfroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. WARE STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOYD v. WARE STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD and DAVIOUS MARQUEZ BOYD
Defendant:
WARE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOYD v. JACKSON ST et al
as 5:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD and DAVIOUS MARQUEZ BOYD
Defendant:
JACKSON ST, GA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MACON STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. BAILEY et al
as 5:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
PAUL BAILEY and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REH FAC et al
as 5:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REH FAC and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REHABILITATION FACILITY
as 5:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD and DAVIOUS MARQUEZ BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REHABILITATION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. Jackson St. et al
as 1:2023cv02574
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Jackson St., GA Department of Corrections, Macon State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
