Cases 41 - 47 of 47
John Bean Technologies Corporation v. Middleby Corporation, The et al
as 1:2009cv05696
Plaintiff:
John Bean Technologies Corporation, John Bean Technologies Corporation, John Bean Technologies Corporation and others
Defendant:
Middleby Corporation, The, Middleby Marshall Inc. and Alkar-RapidPak-MP Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Middleby Marshall Inc. vs. Pizza Equipment Supply, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00369
Plaintiff:
Middleby Marshall Inc., Middleby Marshall Inc., Middleby Marshall Inc. and others
Defendant:
Pizza Equipment Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
ADP Marshall, Inc. v. NORESCO, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00129
Plaintiff:
ADP Marshall, Inc
Defendant:
NORESCO, LLC, NORESCO, LLC, NORESCO, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
NORESCO, LLC, NORESCO, LLC, Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
ADP Marshall, Inc and ADP Marshall, Inc
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
NORESCO, LLC, NORESCO, LLC, Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
