Cases 1 - 10 of 752
Albert v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Arthur Albert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Hampton v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Housoni Hampton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Crews v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Crews
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STARNES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
RACQEL STARNES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Michelle Martin
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
CHAPPELLE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
RONDA CHAPPELLE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
EFIRD v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kyle, Estate of Kepley and MELISSA EFIRD
Defendant:
Rockingham County Sheriff Samuel Scott Page, Southern Health Partners, Inc., M.D. ELTON J. AMOS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stewart v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Deon Stewart
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Handy v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Yvette Handy
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Hensley v. Teets, et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Catherine Hensley, as Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Hensley,
Defendant:
Michael R Teets, Michael G Elizondo, Seth D Summey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
