Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mary Bush v. Alexander Chotkowski, et al
as 20-2099
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEXANDER J. CHOTKOWSKI, JOSEPH BUSH and MICHAEL BUSH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY BUSH
BUSH v. CHOTKOWSKI et al
as 2:2020cv00774
Defendant:
MICHAEL BUSH, JOSEPH BUSH and ALEXANDER J. CHOTKOWSKI
Plaintiff:
MARY BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Bush, et al v. Katherine Platt
as 19-3745
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE KATHERINE B.L. PLATT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY BUSH, individuallly and as daughter, next friend and trustee of Genevieve Bush and GENEVIEVE BUSH
Mary Bush, et al v. Katherine Platt
as 19-3528
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE KATHERINE B.L. PLATT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY BUSH, individuallly and as daughter, next friend and trustee of Genevieve Bush and GENEVIEVE BUSH
BUSH et al v. PLATT
as 2:2019cv04414
Petitioner:
MARY BUSH and GENEVIEVE BUSH
Defendant:
JUDGE KATHERINE B.L. PLATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BUSH v. EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv00327
Plaintiff:
MARY BUSH
Defendant:
EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP, JAMES RENEGAR and TED LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Bush v. Kimberly Goodall, et al
as 17-3568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY BUSH, Pro Se Daughter, Next Friend and Trustee of Genevieve Bush
Defendant - Appellee:
KIMBERLY GOODALL, (Administrator) "Park Lane at Bellingham" (Senior Lifestyles Coporation) Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, SL Master Lessee II, LLC) and DR. SAM J. SUGAR
BUSH v. GOODALL
as 2:2017cv01379
Petitioner:
MARY BUSH
Respondent:
KIMBERLY GOODALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BUSH v. GOODALL
as 2:2017cv01256
Plaintiff:
MARY BUSH
Defendant:
KIMBERLY GOODALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSH v. CHESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AGING et al
as 2:2015cv05008
Petitioner:
MARY BUSH
Respondent:
CHESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AGING, NANCY W. PINE and GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES OF PA
Movant:
JOSEPH BUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
