Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Day-Petrano et al v. Miller et al
as 3:2026cv00519
Plaintiff:
David Frank Petrano and Mary Katherine Day-Petrano
Defendant:
John Miller, Bradford County Telegraph, Inc., Sheriff of Bradford County, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Petrano et al v. Davis et al
as 3:2026cv00245
Plaintiff:
David Frank Petrano and Mary Katherine Day Petrano
Defendant:
Judge Tatum Davis and Daniel Sikes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petrano et al v. U.S. Department of Education et al
as 3:2025cv01487
Plaintiff:
David Frank Petrano and Mary Katherine Day Petrano
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education, Douglas W. Neway, John Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. USAO UT Dist, et al
as 23-4049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY LYNN DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
USAO UT DIST, ANGELA MARIE REDDISH-DAY, UNITED STATES PROBATION FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH and others
Day et al v. Ten D Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00276
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and Ten D Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marie Lorraine Day and Donal Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02559
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02112
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01119
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-14232
Interested Party - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
