Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Roberts v. Fallin et al
as 5:2017cv00760
Plaintiff:
Hurman Lee Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Mary Fallin and Joe Allbaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strange v. Fallin et al
as 5:2017cv00478
Plaintiff:
Robert Joe Strange
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, Joe M Allbaugh, Betsy Hormel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Fallin et al
as 5:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Stephen Craig Burnett
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, Patricia High, Robert Macy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Fallin et al
as 5:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
Stephen Craig Burnett
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, Kevin Gross, Michael Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pottawatomie County v. Fallin, et al
as 17-6055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO. 3, an Agency of the State of Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellant:
MARY FALLIN, Governor of the State of Oklahoma, In Her Respective Official Capacity
Defendant:
J. DAVID BURRAGE, Chairman of the Oklahoma Department of Transportation In His Respective Official Capacity
Knox v. Oklahoma Pardon & Parole Board, et al
as 16-7093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE LAMANDINGO KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, ROBERT H. MACY, JR., PATRICIA HIGH and others
Morris v. Fallin et al
as 5:2016cv01297
Plaintiff:
Darrell Morris
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, Michael W Roach, Frazier Henke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Oklahoma Pardon & Parole Board et al
as 6:2016cv00491
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
Oklahoma Pardon & Parole Board, Robert H. Macy, Jr., Patricia High and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotner v. Bear, et al
as 16-6319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. COTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL BEAR, Warden, HOLLY BAKER, JOE ALLBAUGH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
