Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Von Fox v. Gergel et al
as 2:2023cv06273
Plaintiff:
Von Fox Glynndeavin and Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
Judge Richard Gergel and Judge Mary Gordon Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loyola v. Baker et al
as 6:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Miguel Loyola
Defendant:
Mary Gordon Baker, Captain Carter, M. Lavorando and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loyola v. Baker et al
as 2:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Miguel Loyola
Defendant:
Mary Gordon Baker, Captain Carter, M. Lavorando and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00118
Defendant:
United States Assistant Attorney General William Joseph Maye, United States Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker, United States District Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lee Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv00118
Defendant:
United States Assistant Attorney General William Joseph Maye, United States Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker, United States District Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lee Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Newman et al
as 2:2018cv00622
Plaintiff:
Gertrude C F Hamilton
Defendant:
Melissa Newman, Robert S Carr and Mary Gordon Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathanael Reynolds v. United States District Court, et al
as 17-5163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds
Defendant - Appellee:
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Mary Gordon Baker, Magistrate Judge and Bruce Howe Hendricks, Judge
REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2017cv01104
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, MARY GORDON BAKER and BRUCE HOWE HENDRICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
