Cases
Friends of the Capital C.T. v. United States Army Corps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1544
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEONARD SCENSNY, JOHN MACKNIGHT FITZGERALD and FRIENDS OF THE CAPITAL CRESCENT TRAIL
Defendant / Appellee: CHIEF JOSEPH P. DAVIA, Chief, Maryland Section, Northern United States Army Corps of Engineers, COL. JOHN T. LITZ, Commander and District Engineer United States Army Corps of Engineers and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
v. Glass et al
as 1:2019cv01817
Claimant: attorney Michael E. Glass
Defendant: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2117
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1215
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00191
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01550
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv03732
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?