Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Ford v. Blunt et al
as 2:2007cv04184
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Ford
Defendant:
Matt Blunt, Larry Crawford, Tom Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 4:2007cv00649
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Stewart C. Hudson, George W. Bush, Paul D. Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laughlin v. Blunt et al
as 4:2007cv00479
Petitioner:
Dwight Laughlin
Defendant:
Matt Blunt, Michael Bowersox and R. Scott watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Washington v. Blunt et al
as 2:2007cv04109
Plaintiff:
Ecclesiastical Denzel Washington
Defendant:
Matt Blunt, Larry Crawford, Dave Dormire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Descamps v. Bush et al
as 2:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Descamps
Defendant:
George W Bush, Alberto Gonzalrs, Robert McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammett v. Blunt et al
as 2:2007cv04013
Plaintiff:
Rawlings H. Hammett
Defendant:
Matt Blunt, Jeremiah W. Nixon, Department of Natural Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Pollutants & Permit Violations
Fesenmeyer v. Blunt et al
as 2:2007cv04005
Plaintiff:
Paula Fesenmeyer
Defendant:
Matt Blunt, Jeremiah W Nixon, Department of Natural Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Pollutants & Permit Violations
Torregrosa v. Blunt et al
as 2:2007cv04010
Plaintiff:
Joseph Torregrosa
Defendant:
Matt Blunt, Jeremiah (Jay) W Nixon, Department of Natural Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Farris v. Sweeny et al
as 6:2007cv03015
Petitioner:
Aaron Farris
Respondent:
Sweeny, HOlden and Matt Blunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
