Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Irvin v. Google.com et al
as 0:2024cv60145
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Google.com, YouTube.com, Alexis Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irvin v. Google.com et al
as 4:2023cv06659
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Google.com, YouTube.com, Alexis Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moore v. Irvine et al
as 2:2022cv02096
Plaintiff:
Ryan Moore
Defendant:
Matthew Irvine and Exedra Collective LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
IRVIN et al v. CAMPBELL et al
as 1:2021cv02080
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW IRVIN and BLUE HOLLOW INCORPORATON
Defendant:
JOSEPH CAMPBELL, COURTNEY HOYT, KEN MASCARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRVIN SR. v. MASCORA
as 1:2021cv02083
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW IRVIN SR.
Defendant:
KEN MASCORA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ludowici Roof Tile, Inc. v. Restoremasters, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv05469
Defendant:
Restoremasters, LLC, Restore Masters Contracting, LLC, Justin Reichl and others
Plaintiff:
Ludowici Roof Tile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Irvin v. Irvin et al
as 0:2019cv62432
Defendant:
Ryan Phillips Sr., Lonnie Stephens, Benjamin Ryals and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IRVIN v. ONFIRE ENTERTAINMENT et al
as 1:2019cv01782
Defendant:
INTERSCOPE RECORDS, STUDIO 954 LLC, SONY MUSIC NASHVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW IRVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IRVIN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv01594
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW IRVIN
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DONALD TRUMP, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
