Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Janczuk v. Inner City Press et al
as 1:2024cv02385
Plaintiff:
Weronika E.K. Janczuk
Defendant:
Inner City Press and Reporter Matthew Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Rose et al
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Timothy Rose, Lorenzo Emilio and 10th Judicial District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mixson v. Louisiana Horticulture Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Angele Mixson
Defendant:
Louisiana Horticulture Commission, Rob Barry, III, George Bofinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Canter v. Kilgore et al
as 7:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Canter
Defendant:
Major Kilgore, Captain Tatum, Lt. Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
ITES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11509
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LEE ITES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Flowers v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00753
Petitioner:
Matthew Lee Flowers
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
