Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Lomax v. Skid Row Housing Trust, et al.
as 24-130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX
Defendant / Appellee:
SKID ROW HOUSING TRUST and THIANNE GARRETT, Sister of the Deceased brother Edward Levy
Mattie Twynette Lomax v. Skid Row Housing Trust et al
as 8:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Mattie Twynette Lomax
Defendant:
Skid Row Housing Trust and Thianne Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lomax v. Mayor of the City of Miami
as 23-1982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, CITY OF MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT, JORGE LOO and others
Lomax v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
as 23-1902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Mattie Lomax v. Shanike Graves, et al
as 23-11194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANIKE A. GRAVES, ANGELICA A. CRUZ, LUPE SECO and others
Lomax v. Wal-Mart Stores East
as 23-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, MARIE ELENA CASTILLO, JESSY FAIR and others
Lomax v. Miami Police Department
as 23-1504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHNNIE BERNELL MATHIS
Lomax v. Capital Rental Agency, Inc.
as 23-1458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPITAL RENTAL AGENCY, INC., AMERICAN INVESTMENT SERVICES, GREGORY SCHWEITZER and others
Lomax v. Montaldo
as 23-1456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
HARVEY RUVIN, SHIRLEY SHABAZZ, MICHAEL HENDERSON and others
Lomax v. Patel et al
as 1:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
Mattie Twynette Lomax
Defendant:
Aswin Patel, Binta Patel doing business as Brown Bear Holding 77 and Kettle & Oak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
