Cases 41 - 50 of 2,032
US v. Deangelo Joyner
as 24-4036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEANGELO MAURICE JOYNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Maurice SinkfieldIn re: Maurice Sinkfield
as 24-3021
Petitioner:
In re: MAURICE J. SINKFIELD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rowe Plastic Surgery of New Jersey, L.L.C. v. Aetna Insurance Company
as 23-8083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROWE PLASTIC SURGERY OF NEW JERSEY, L.L.C. and NORMAN MAURICE ROWE, M.D., M.H.A., L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
United States of America v. Portee (Andrews)
as 23-8046
Defendant:
OMAR PORTEE, PAULETTE MCCARTHA, GARY E. JACKSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LEMREY ANDREWS, Pimp Blood Red, Pimp Bloody and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Menafee
as 23-8040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
MAURICE MENAFEE
Deckel v. Singer, et al.
as 23-4188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN DECKEL
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN SINGER, MAX WELLMAN, JOSHUA HANASAB and others
Flanigan v. Harris, et al.
as 23-4208
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE M. FLANIGAN, also known as Maurice Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
JARED HARRIS, Officer, BRIAN HICKLIN, Officer and CONROY TAM, Sergeant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
