Cases 1 - 10 of 930
USA v. Antonio Davis
as 24-3406
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTONIO MAURICE DAVIS, aka Anthony Maurice Davis
Dominick Jones v. Linsia, et al
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK MAURICE JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINSIA, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GUNWIN, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAKE, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity and others
Freeman v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00776
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Hutchinson Antivibration Systems, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Hutchinson Antivibration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Maurice v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Craig Maurice
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Freeman v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv01862
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ATD Business Consulting, Inc. v. BGC Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01537
Defendant:
BGC Solutions LLC, Farm Stores Franchising, LLC, Holstein & Penn LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ATD Business Consulting, Inc. doing business as Franchise Business Source
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Linsia et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Dominick Maurice Jones
Defendant:
Unknown Linsia, Unknown Gunwin, Unknown Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Randolph v. Matt Macauley
as 24-1202
Petitioner:
ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLF and ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLPH
Respondent:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
