Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Talley v. Job et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Maurice Talley
Defendant:
Job, Clay and Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Roop et al
as 3:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Maurice Talley
Defendant:
Roop, Corey and Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. John Does 1-3
as 3:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Maurice Talley
Defendant:
John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Holmes v. Laboratory Corporation of America et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Maurice Holmes
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America, Family Support Division (Clark County, Nevada) and Lammie King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Nevada Department of Corrections Medical Department et al
as 3:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Mardell Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections Medical Department, Dr. Naughton, Dr. Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godfrey v. Imlay et al
as 2:2022cv02020
Plaintiff:
Maurice Godfrey
Defendant:
Darin F Imlay and Kenton Eichacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Daniels et al
as 3:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Sean Maurice Dean
Defendant:
Charles Daniels and William Quenge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Daniels et al
as 2:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
Maurice Moore
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Brian Williams, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01453
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
