Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Mabon v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02588
Petitioner:
Maurice Mabon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Spivey v. CITY OF MEMPHIS et al
as 2:2023cv02228
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk and Master W. Aaron Hall
Plaintiff:
Claude Maurice Spivey
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS and City of Memphis Civil Service Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Blocker v. Genovese
as 1:2022cv01270
Petitioner:
Maurice Blocker and Ricky M. Blocker
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese and Sharon Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Palmer v. Saul
as 1:2019cv01208
Plaintiff:
Maurice Palmer
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corp v. Merriweather et al
as 2:2019cv02273
Defendant:
Laquita Leatherwood, Maurice Merriweather and Shelia Lurry
Plaintiff:
Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Methodist Healthcare et al
as 2:2018cv02481
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
University of Tenn., Clyde Jones, Regional One Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyree v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 2:2018mc00008
Plaintiff:
Maurice Tyree
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C. Substitute Trustee, Jerry Bridenbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Purdie v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv02914
Petitioner:
Maurice Darnell Purdie
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02490
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
