Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Livingston et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00834
Plaintiff:
Livingston, Tara Hogate Livingston, Angel Johnson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. McAndrews
as 3:2021cv00774
Plaintiff:
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Defendant:
Mr. James McAndrews
Ryan v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04865
Defendant:
David Fisher, Keith Richman, Katrina Lake and others
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Luftig v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04704
Defendant:
David Fisher, Keith Richman, Katrina Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Luftig
WATERMAN v. GRUBHUB INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02414
Defendant:
DAVID FISHER, KEITH RICHMAN, DAVID HABIGER and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Heilmeier v. Grubhub, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04687
Defendant:
David Fisher, Keith Richman, Katrina Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Max Heilmeier
Williams v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00729
Defendant:
David Fisher, Keith Richman, Katrina Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams
Litwin v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04581
Defendant:
David Fisher, Keith Richman, Katrina Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Litwin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
