Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Sharp v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv03028
Plaintiff:
Barry L. Sharp
Defendant:
United States of America, (fnu) (lnu) and (fnu) McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hoyt v. Fort Scott, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2022cv02399
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hoyt
Defendant:
Fort Scott, Kansas, City of and Mark McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2021cv03269
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, M. Fellig, B. Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2021cv03106
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Fellig, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blu Nightclub et al v. Minns et al
as 6:2020cv01340
Defendant:
Lacey Cruse, Adrienne Byrne, Pete Meitzer and others
Plaintiff:
Party Express, LLC, Wichita's Ballroom, Bradley J Steven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02541
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schrader v. Emporia State University et al
as 2:2019cv02387
Defendant:
Emporia State University, David Cordle, Allison Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
Brian W. Schrader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
