Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MCCRAE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv18387
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
PEGGI MCCRAE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABDUL-AZIZ v. THE CITY OF ELIZABETH N.J. POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv07675
Plaintiff:
MR. ABDUL-AZIZ
Defendant:
THE CITY OF ELIZABETH N.J. POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES COSGROVE, LINDA LENSCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZIZ v. ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv07296
Plaintiff:
ABDUL AZIZ
Defendant:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, HUMBERTO ALVEREZ, PAUL MCCRAE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRAE v. MEDIDATA SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2013cv07842
Plaintiff:
NA'EEM A. MCCRAE
Defendant:
MEDIDATA SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
VINES v. COLUMBUS HOUSE et al
as 3:2013cv03923
Plaintiff:
SANDRA VINES
Defendant:
COLUMBUS HOUSE, MR. SALAGA, MS. NEWBORN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SZEMPLE v. UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 3:2010cv00457
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, ART BREWER, Y. SOLIMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIPOLI et al v. FAUNCE et al
as 2:2009cv02771
Plaintiff:
PETER G. RIPOLI, JR. and ABDUL Y. ISLAM
Defendant:
SCOTT A. FAUNCE, ALFARO A. ORTIZ, ROY L. HENDRICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S.M. ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. V. LARRY C. MCCRAE, INC., et al
as 2:2009cv02412
Plaintiff:
S.M. ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
LARRY C. MCCRAE, INC. and LARRY C. MCCRAE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
