Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Mahlen et al v. Mahlen et al
as 9:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Mahlen, Jr., John L. Wright, Sean P. McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Megan N. Mahlen, Crystal West, Jr., Bitterroot Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
United States of America, et al. v. McDaniel, et al.
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LARRY ANTHONY MCDANIEL
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 23-3551
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, XAVIER BECERRA, KEITH L. FAGUNDES and others
Eli Quintanilla v. Department of Corrections Guam, et al
as 22-70111
Petitioner:
ELI CHARFAUROS QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS GUAM, ALLEN BORJA, Warden, GUAM PAROLE BOARD, P.O. II and others
Cole v. Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00747
Defendant:
Virtus Strategy Trust, Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, Allianz Funds Multi-Strategy Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Emily E. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Keshone Owens v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 21-17039
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KESHONE OWENS
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DZURENDA, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, JEREMY BEAN, Warden and others
Defendant:
TONY CORDA, ADAM ENDEL, E. K. MCDANIEL and others
USA v. Phillip Hurbace, et al
as 21-10317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PHILLIP D. HURBACE
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY ANTHONY MCDANIEL and SYLVIANE DELLA WHITMORE, AKA Sylviane Cordova
Joseph Antonetti v. E. McDaniels, et al
as 21-16687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIELS, R. BAKER, BYRNES, AKA Byrne and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
