Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Foster v. McDaniel
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Naomi Foster
Defendant:
Cheryl McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00182
Petitioner:
Terreal A. McDaniel and Terreall McDaniel
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McDaniels v. USA
as 5:2023cv00190
Petitioner:
Vonnie J. McDaniels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Walker v. Kenney et al
as 5:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ronny Deviod Walker, Sr., Ron D.M, D.J. Ron G. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Kenney, Angela Turner Dunham, k.buscaglia@copyright.com and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arlinghaus v. Campbell County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Executor:
Debbie Arlinghaus
Defendant:
Campbell County Detention Center, James Daley, Mark Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Quintana et al
as 5:2020cv00358
Defendant:
Francisco Quintana, McDaniel Mathew, Christopher Gomez and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chism v. Quintana et al
as 5:2018cv00393
Plaintiff:
Cedric Chism
Defendant:
Francisco Quintana, Donald Murphy, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDaniel v. Jones et al
as 6:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDaniel
Defendant:
R. Jones and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2010cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jaron S. Teague
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Eleanore Garber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arflack v. County of Henderson, Kentucky et al
as 4:2007cv00144
Plaintiff:
Mark C. Arflack
Defendant:
County of Henderson, Kentucky, Ed Brady, Ron Herrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
